Brockway v. Abbott
This text of 74 P. 1069 (Brockway v. Abbott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal in this cause for the reason that no notice of appeal has been served upon the sureties who executed the bond for security for costs, demanded of, and furnished and filed by, the plaintiff in the court below. This case can not be distinguished from Pierce v. Commercial Investment Co., 30 Wash. 272, 72 Pac. 473, where it was held that the appeal would be dismissed where the sureties on the cost bond had not received notice of the appeal.
The motion will therefore be sustained, and the appeal dismissed.3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 P. 1069, 34 Wash. 700, 1904 Wash. LEXIS 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brockway-v-abbott-wash-1904.