Brockway Motor Truck Corp. v. Friedman

Third Circuit

Brockway Motor Truck Corp. v. Friedman

61 F.2d 519, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4321

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedSeptember 23, 1932

DocketNo. 4880

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 F.2d 519 (Brockway Motor Truck Corp. v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brockway Motor Truck Corp. v. Friedman, 61 F.2d 519, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4321 (3d Cir. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This is another of the constantly recurring questions of whether machinery, etc., in the possession of a bankrupt was held by bailment or conditional sale. Necessarily each case turns on its particular facts and the instrument under which 'it is held and whether they constituted a bailment or a conditional sale.

Tho facts and a discussion of the, writing here involved are fully set forth in the opinion of the referee (1 F. Supp. 531), and by reference thereto we avoid needless repetition. The referee therein held there was no bailment. On certificate, the court below adopted tbe referee’s view. After due consideration had, we come to the same conclusion, and therefore limit ourselves to affirming the court’s decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This is another of the constantly recurring questions of whether machinery, etc., in the possession of a bankrupt was held by bailment or conditional sale. Necessarily each case turns on its particular facts and the instrument under which 'it is held and whether they constituted a bailment or a conditional sale.

Tho facts and a discussion of the, writing here involved are fully set forth in the opinion of the referee (1 F. Supp. 531), and by reference thereto we avoid needless repetition. The referee therein held there was no bailment. On certificate, the court below adopted tbe referee’s view. After due consideration had, we come to the same conclusion, and therefore limit ourselves to affirming the court’s decree.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 F.2d 519, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brockway-motor-truck-corp-v-friedman-ca3-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack