Brockman v. Bowman

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Brockman v. Bowman

10 S.C. Eq. 338

DecidedJune 15, 1833

StatusPublished

This text of 10 S.C. Eq. 338 (Brockman v. Bowman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brockman v. Bowman, 10 S.C. Eq. 338 (S.C. Ct. App. 1833).

Pincite

Opinion

Where a bill is filed by creditors to avoid the alienation of a deceased person for fraud, his executor or administrator is a necessary party; and if the Court should set aside the conveyance, it will order the property to be delivered to the executor or administrator, to be applied in due course of administration. The suing creditors are not entitled to have their demands paid out of the property, in preference to others.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Where a bill is filed by creditors to avoid the alienation of a deceased person for fraud, his executor or administrator is a necessary party; and if the Court should set aside the conveyance, it will order the property to be delivered to the executor or administrator, to be applied in due course of administration. The suing creditors are not entitled to have their demands paid out of the property, in preference to others.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 S.C. Eq. 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brockman-v-bowman-scctapp-1833.