Brockley's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Brockley's Appeal

4 A. 210, 2 Sadler 569, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 739

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 31, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 4 A. 210 (Brockley's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brockley's Appeal, 4 A. 210, 2 Sadler 569, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 739 (Pa. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

There is no error in this decree. It is ruled by Follweiler’s Appeal, 102 Pa. 581.

Although Mrs. Brogly did sell the real estate under a power given in the will of her husband, yet it is found as a fact that she did not use any part of the'proceeds. She therefore held them as she had held the land, and, in the language of the will,, they were “left” as a part of the estate of her husband.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

There is no error in this decree. It is ruled by Follweiler’s Appeal, 102 Pa. 581.

Although Mrs. Brogly did sell the real estate under a power given in the will of her husband, yet it is found as a fact that she did not use any part of the'proceeds. She therefore held them as she had held the land, and, in the language of the will,, they were “left” as a part of the estate of her husband.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A. 210, 2 Sadler 569, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brockleys-appeal-pa-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack