Brockley's Appeal

4 A. 210, 2 Sadler 569, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 739

Opinion

Per Curiam :

There is no error in this decree. It is ruled by Follweiler’s Appeal, 102 Pa. 581.

Although Mrs. Brogly did sell the real estate under a power given in the will of her husband, yet it is found as a fact that she did not use any part of the'proceeds. She therefore held them as she had held the land, and, in the language of the will,, they were “left” as a part of the estate of her husband.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.