Brocklebank v. Eastern Financial Federal Credit Union

634 So. 2d 171, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1003, 1994 WL 45316
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 15, 1994·No. No. 92-2495·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Section 687.0304, Fla.Stat. (1991); Griffiths v. Barnett Bank of Naples, 603 So.2d 690, 692 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (The court, in construing Section 687.0304 as to an oral credit agreement, upheld summary judgment in favor of the lender, stating that, “the absence of any written credit agreement bars an action against the bank on the credit agreement.”); see AFM Corp. v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 515 So.2d 180 (Fla.1987); Florida Power & Light Co. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 510 So.2d 899 (Fla.1987); Canell v. Areola Housing Corp., 65 So.2d 849 (Fla.1953); GAF Corp. v. Zack Co., 445 So.2d 350, 351 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 453 So.2d 45 (Fla.1984); Ostman v. Lawn, 305 So.2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brocklebank v. Eastern Financial Federal Credit Union, 634 So. 2d 171, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1003, 1994 WL 45316 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

634 So. 2d 171 (Brocklebank v. Eastern Financial Federal Credit Union) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. State
634 So. 2d 171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)