Brockhurst v. Cox

73 A. 1117, 72 N.J. Eq. 950, 2 Buchanan 950, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 332
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 17, 1907·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Garrison in the court below.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bogert, Vre-DENBURGH, VROOM, GREEN, GRAY, DlLL—14. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brockhurst v. Cox, 73 A. 1117, 72 N.J. Eq. 950, 2 Buchanan 950, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 332 (N.J. 1907).

73 A. 1117 (Brockhurst v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Osco Motors Corp. v. Martin
45 A.2d 454 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)
Locke Cotton Mills Co. v. Plasket
183 A. 682 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)
Central-Penn, Bank v. N.J. Fidelity
182 A. 262 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)
Smith v. Commercial Credit Corp.
165 A. 637 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)
Manzo v. Manzo
133 A. 190 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)