Brockhaus v. O'Reilly Automotive Stores Inc
This text of Brockhaus v. O'Reilly Automotive Stores Inc (Brockhaus v. O'Reilly Automotive Stores Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
MARK BROCKHAUS, )
) Plaintiff, )
v. ) Case No. 1:24-cv-00489-HAB-SLC ) O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES ) INC., ) ) Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Defendant O'Reilly Automotive Stores Inc., removed this case here from the Allen County Superior Court on November 19, 2024, alleging diversity of citizenship as the basis for jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (ECF 1). Subject matter jurisdiction is the first issue that must be addressed, Baker v. IBP, Inc., 357 F.3d 685, 687 (7th Cir. 2004), and thus, the Court raises the issue sua sponte, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3). Defendant’s diversity allegations are lacking in one respect as to Plaintiff. Defendant alleges that “Plaintiff is believed to be a citizen of Indiana.” (ECF 1 ¶ 8 (emphasis added)). But “[a]llegations of federal subject matter jurisdiction may not be made on the basis of information and belief, only personal knowledge.” Yount v. Shashek, 472 F. Supp. 2d 1055, 1057 n.1 (S.D. Ill. 2006) (collecting cases); see also Am.’s Best Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir. 1992); Ferolie Corp. v. Advantage Sales & Mktg., LLC, No. 04 C 5425, 2004 WL 2433114, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 28, 2004). Further, Defendant alleges that it “is a citizen of Missouri, with its principal place of business located at 233 S Patterson Ave, Springfield, MO 65802.” A corporation is considered a citizen of the state by which it is incorporated and the state where it has its principal place of business. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1); see also N. Trust Co. v. Bunge Corp., 899 F.2d 591, 594-95 (7th Cir. 1990). Defendant has failed to provide its state of incorporation. Therefore, Defendant is AFFORDED to and including December 23, 2024, to file a supplemental jurisdiction statement that adequately alleges the parties’ citizenship. See Chase v.
Shop ‘N Save Warehouse Foods, Inc., 110 F.3d 424, 427 (7th Cir. 1997) (stating that the party seeking to invoke federal diversity jurisdiction bears the burden of demonstrating that the requirement of complete diversity has been met). SO ORDERED. Entered this 16th day of December 2024. /s/ Susan Collins Susan Collins United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brockhaus v. O'Reilly Automotive Stores Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brockhaus-v-oreilly-automotive-stores-inc-innd-2024.