Brockett v. State

125 S.E. 513, 33 Ga. App. 57, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 718
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 13, 1924
Docket15779
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 125 S.E. 513 (Brockett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brockett v. State, 125 S.E. 513, 33 Ga. App. 57, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 718 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In our opinion the slot machine as operated by the defendant was a gambling device, within the meaning 'of the statute. Meyer v. State, 112 Ga. 20 (37 S. E. 96, 51 L. R. A. 496, 81 Am. St. Rep. 17), and authorities cited; Alexander v. Atlanta, 13 Ga. App. 354 (79 S. E. 177).

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Johnnie Wilson
475 F.2d 108 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)
Boyd v. Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc.
155 S.E.2d 630 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
AAA Amusements, Inc. v. State of Georgia
127 S.E.2d 919 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Miller v. State
74 S.E.2d 108 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Thompson v. Ledbetter
39 S.E.2d 720 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Elder v. Camp
18 S.E.2d 622 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Jorman v. State
188 S.E. 925 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Jenner v. State
159 S.E. 564 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Harvie v. Heise, Sheriff
148 S.E. 66 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1929)
Marvin v. Sloan
250 P. 443 (Montana Supreme Court, 1926)
State v. Krauss
151 N.E. 183 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 513, 33 Ga. App. 57, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brockett-v-state-gactapp-1924.