Brocket v. Johns
4 F. Cas. 200, 1 Cranch 100
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedNovember 15, 1802
StatusPublished
This text of 4 F. Cas. 200 (Brocket v. Johns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brocket v. Johns, 4 F. Cas. 200, 1 Cranch 100 (circtddc 1802).
Opinion
But THE COURT overruled the motion to quash. The act does not confine the attachment to goods on the premises. The object of the law is to compel the tenant to give security for his rent, and it is of no importance what property is seized to produce that effect. (KILTY, Chief Judge, contra.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 F. Cas. 200, 1 Cranch 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brocket-v-johns-circtddc-1802.