Brock v. Surpless
This text of 72 N.Y.S. 831 (Brock v. Surpless) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendants have procured an order compelling the plaintiff to produce for the defendants’ inspection the account books of a foreign corporation not a party to the action. The plaintiff, under oath, denies custody, possession, control, power, authority, or right to the books, and avers that they are in the possession, custody, and control of the secretary of the company, whom he names, pursuant to resolution of the board of directors. These allegations are unrefuted. The defendants’ counsel admits in his brief that “after an exhaustive research” he can find no authority in point. The case of Martine v. Albro, 26 Hun, 559, related1 to books which were in the defendants’ undisputed possession, and which they had already produced for inspection, pursuant to a prior order. As the order appealed from herein relates to books not within the terms of section 803 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as to possession or control, either literally or constructively, it must be reversed, and the motion denied.
Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 N.Y.S. 831, 66 A.D. 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brock-v-surpless-nyappdiv-1901.