Brock v. State

204 So. 3d 488, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10857
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 15, 2016·No. No. 5D16-715·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of Appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence [489]*489without prejudice to the trial court correcting the scrivener’s error on the judgment and sentence, so as to confirm that Appellant’s conviction on Count III was previously vacated.

AFFIRMED.'

SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brock v. State, 204 So. 3d 488, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10857 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

204 So. 3d 488 (Brock v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.