Brock v. State

988 So. 2d 1283, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 12892, 2008 WL 3978339
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brock v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 954 So. 2d 87
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 29, 2008·No. No. 5D08-1200·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Shawn L. Brock appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm without comment the trial court’s order in all respects except as to claim six. Brock’s claim six is facially sufficient and has not been refuted by the record. Brock is entitled to an evidentiary hearing as to that claim. Nelson v. State, 875 So.2d 579 (Fla.2004); Jacobs v. State, 880 So.2d 548 (Fla.2004). Therefore, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on claim six.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brock v. State, 988 So. 2d 1283, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 12892, 2008 WL 3978339 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

988 So. 2d 1283 (Brock v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nelson v. State
875 So. 2d 579 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Jacobs v. State
880 So. 2d 548 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)