Brock v. Niemeyer

2011 Ohio 4704, 130 Ohio St. 3d 80
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 21, 2011
Docket2011-0470
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2011 Ohio 4704 (Brock v. Niemeyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brock v. Niemeyer, 2011 Ohio 4704, 130 Ohio St. 3d 80 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment dismissing the complaint and denying the motion of appellant, Dennis R. Brock, to allow his cause to proceed. Brock’s complaint alleged violations of his civil rights pursuant to R.C. 2921.52(E). Brock’s complaint invoked neither the original nor the appellate jurisdiction of the court of appeals. Section 3(B)(1) and (2), Article IV, Ohio Constitution. We also deny appellant’s motions for leave to correct and to direct the appellate court to attach requested documents.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brock v. Moore
2013 Ohio 70 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)
Hillman v. Brown
2012 Ohio 1652 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2011 Ohio 4704, 130 Ohio St. 3d 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brock-v-niemeyer-ohio-2011.