Brock v. Hurst
135 S.E. 320, 36 Ga. App. 57, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 760
This text of 135 S.E. 320 (Brock v. Hurst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brock v. Hurst, 135 S.E. 320, 36 Ga. App. 57, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 760 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
The motion for a new trial being upon the general grounds only, and the verdict being fully authorized by the evidence and approved by the trial judge, this court is not authorized to set it aside.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 S.E. 320, 36 Ga. App. 57, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brock-v-hurst-gactapp-1926.