Brock v. Brock

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brock v. Brock

214 S.W.3d 411, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 297, 2007 WL 509743

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 20, 2007·No. No. ED 88091·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gordon Brock (“husband”) appeals the judgment of the trial court entering a full order of protection against him. Husband claims the trial court improperly denied him an adversarial hearing, and the order of protection was not supported by substantial and competent evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gordon Brock (“husband”) appeals the judgment of the trial court entering a full order of protection against him. Husband claims the trial court improperly denied him an adversarial hearing, and the order of protection was not supported by substantial and competent evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Brock v. Brock, 214 S.W.3d 411, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 297, 2007 WL 509743 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

214 S.W.3d 411 (Brock v. Brock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.