Brock v. Berry

31 Me. 293
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1850·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Howard, J., orally.

We hold, with the District Court, that the motion to abate the writ was too late.

The facts tend to show that the tenancy was at will; but the parties have agreed it was at sufferance. The owner, then, had no right to enter by force. The tenant was entitled to reasonable time in which to remove, and might stay till removed by legal process. The owner had a legal remedy; he adopted an illegal one. Action sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brock v. Berry, 31 Me. 293 (Me. 1850).

31 Me. 293 (Brock v. Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Entelman v. Hagood
22 S.E. 545 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)
Simmons v. Thompson
1 Handy 521 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1855)