Brock & Scott Holdings, Inc. v. West

694 S.E.2d 764, 364 N.C. 235, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 415
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 17, 2010
DocketNo. 352PA09
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 694 S.E.2d 764 (Brock & Scott Holdings, Inc. v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brock & Scott Holdings, Inc. v. West, 694 S.E.2d 764, 364 N.C. 235, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 415 (N.C. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

[236]*236IN THE MATTER OF: J.A.G.

) ) )

ORDER

No. 69P10

The Court allows the State’s petition for discretionary review for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of our decision in In re D.S., No. 273PA09 (June 17, 2010).

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 16th day of June, 2010.

For the Court

Hudson, J.

[237]*237STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAMIEN SMITH

) ) ) ) )

No. 58P10

The Court allows the State’s petition for discretionary review for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of our decision in In re D.S., No. 273PA09 (June 17, 2010).

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 16th day of June, 2010.

[238]*238WILLIAM L. UNDERWOOD v. TERESA W. UNDERWOOD

‡«*‡‡‡‡‡*‡(*‡)«*

No. 447P09

We treat this petition as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, and allow for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Walters v. Walters, 307 N.C. 381, 298 S.E.2d 338 (1983).

By order of this Court in Conference, this 16th day of June, 2010.

[239]*239[[Image here]]

[240]*240[[Image here]]

[241]*241[[Image here]]

[242]*242Moss Creek Homeowners Ass’n. v. Bissette Case below: 202 N.C. App.-(2 February 2010) No. 107P10 1. Defs’ and Third-Party Pits’ (Ted and Mary Bissette) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA08-1156-2) 2. Pits’ and Third-Party Defs’ Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 1. Denied 06/16/10 2. Dismissed as Moot 06/16/10 Puckett v. N.C. Dep’t of Corr. Case below: 202 N.C. App.-(16 February 2010) No. 126P10 Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA09-782) Denied 06/16/10 Reese v. Mecklenburg Cty. Case below: 200 N.C. App.-(3 November 2009) No. 505P09 Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA08-1417) Denied 06/16/10 State v. Arrington Case below: 202 N.C. App. —■ (2 March 2010) No. 132P10 Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA09-660) Denied 06/16/10 State v. Arrington Case below: 198 N.C. App.-(21 July 2009) No. 138P10 Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA08-1355) Denied 06/16/10 State v. Berrio Case below: 202 N.C. App.-(19 January 2010) No. 087P10 Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA09-608) Denied 06/16/10 State v. Blakeman Case below: 202 N.C. App.-(2 February 2010) No. 102P10 Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA09-699) Denied 06/16/10 State v. Breathette Case below: 202 N.C. App.-(2 March 2010) No. 154P10 Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA09-1007) . Denied 06/16/10 State v. Brennan Case below: 203 N.C. App.-(4 May 2010) No. 211P10 State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA09-1362) Allowed 05/21/10

[243]*243[[Image here]]

[244]*244[[Image here]]

[245]*245[[Image here]]

[246]*246[[Image here]]

[247]*247[[Image here]]

[248]*248PETITION TO REHEAR

[[Image here]]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Underwood v. Underwood
717 S.E.2d 361 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2011)
BROCK AND SCOTT HOLDINGS, INC. v. West
694 S.E.2d 764 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
694 S.E.2d 764, 364 N.C. 235, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brock-scott-holdings-inc-v-west-nc-2010.