Brock Cordel Cuerington v. State
This text of Brock Cordel Cuerington v. State (Brock Cordel Cuerington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-18-00328-CR
BROCK CORDEL CUERINGTON, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 361st District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 14-01969-CRF-361
ABATEMENT ORDER
The reporter’s record was filed with this Court on January 24, 2019; however,
State’s Exhibit 22, a body camera video, is still not viewable by this Court, despite various
attempts to remedy the issue.
Accordingly, this appeal is ABATED to the trial court to, within 21 days from the
date of this Order, oversee the filing of a copy of State’s Exhibit 22 in a format that is
viewable after it has been uploaded/filed via the clerk/reporter portal into the Court’s
case management software, a.k.a. TAMES. If this is functionally impractical to accomplish, then the trial court is ordered to oversee the transfer of State’s Exhibit 22 to
a format that is viewable on any modern DVD player or computer drive without any
other proprietary software and labeled to identify the specific software needed to view
the file.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Appeal abated Order issued and filed May 22, 2019
Cuerington v. State Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brock Cordel Cuerington v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brock-cordel-cuerington-v-state-texapp-2019.