Broche v. State
701 So. 2d 446, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12975, 1997 WL 716041
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 19, 1997·No. No. 96-3576·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentences for first degree murder, armed burglary, and armed robbery without prejudice for him to raise his challenge to his trial counsel’s closing argument before the jury on a 3.850, Fla. R.Crim. P., postconviction motion in the lower court. See Nixon v. State, 572 So.2d 1336, 1340 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 854, 112 S.Ct. 164, 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Broche v. State, 701 So. 2d 446, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12975, 1997 WL 716041 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
701 So. 2d 446 (Broche v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bailey v. State
145 So. 3d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Perez v. State
711 So. 2d 1215 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)