Brocco v. Savage

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 28, 2001
• Docket: 01-1824
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1824

JAMES M. BROCCO; OLGA BROCCO,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

RICKY SAVAGE,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

ED WOODARD; COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA; THE FITNESS COMPANY; HYATT CORPORATION,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-00-1685-A)

Submitted: November 19, 2001 Decided: November 28, 2001

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor M. Glasberg, Kelly M. Baldrate, VICTOR M. GLASBERG & ASSO- CIATES, Alexandria, Virginia; Henry W. Asbill, William B. Moffitt, ASBILL, JUNKIN, MOFFITT & BOSS, CHTD., Washington, D.C., for Appellants. David J. Fudala, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

James and Olga Brocco appeal the district court’s order deny-

ing relief on their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Brocco v. Savage, No. CA-00-1685-A

(E.D. Va. May 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED