Brocco v. Ochroch

201 A.2d 605, 415 Pa. 153, 1964 Pa. LEXIS 435
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1964
DocketAppeal, No. 237
StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.2d 605 (Brocco v. Ochroch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brocco v. Ochroch, 201 A.2d 605, 415 Pa. 153, 1964 Pa. LEXIS 435 (Pa. 1964).

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In an action of trespass, appellant won a substantial jury verdict against appellees. Appellee’s motion for judgment n.o.v. was granted, thereby giving rise to this appeal. We have carefully examined the record and the contentions of the parties, and come to the inescapable conclusion that the court below properly decided that appellees were not negligent. It is, therefore, not necessary to consider the problem of contributory negligence, assumption of risk or testing a known danger. Nor is there any necessity to determine the question of whether appellant’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 A.2d 605, 415 Pa. 153, 1964 Pa. LEXIS 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brocco-v-ochroch-pa-1964.