Brobst v. Brobst

69 U.S. 96, 17 L. Ed. 905, 2 Wall. 96, 1864 U.S. LEXIS 411
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 10, 1865
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 69 U.S. 96 (Brobst v. Brobst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brobst v. Brobst, 69 U.S. 96, 17 L. Ed. 905, 2 Wall. 96, 1864 U.S. LEXIS 411 (1865).

Opinion

Mr. Justice NELSON

delivered the opinion of the court.

It appears that an appeal has been taken from that part of the case covered by the final decree, and a certificate of division-upon the residue.

There is no objection to this practice. It has been recognized and acted upon in several instances in this court.

*97 The questions arising on this appeal, and on the certificate of division, come up together, and- are heard on-the same record,.

The omission to file the bond, under the circumstances, may be corrected by filing one in conformity with the act of Congress. The peculiar state of the record, and, mode of bringing up the questions from the court below, probably misled the solicitors.

Let a rule be entered, that the appellant have sixty days from notice of it, to file a bond with the clerk of the court, to be approved by the proper officer, upon complying with which, this motion be dismissed; otherwise granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Houghteling
104 F. 513 (Seventh Circuit, 1900)
Vaill v. Town Council
28 A. 344 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1893)
McClelland Bros. v. Allison
34 Kan. 155 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1885)
Peugh v. Davis
110 U.S. 227 (Supreme Court, 1884)
Humiston v. Stainthorp
69 U.S. 106 (Supreme Court, 1865)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 U.S. 96, 17 L. Ed. 905, 2 Wall. 96, 1864 U.S. LEXIS 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brobst-v-brobst-scotus-1865.