Broback v. Huff

11 Or. 395
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 Or. 395 (Broback v. Huff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Broback v. Huff, 11 Or. 395 (Or. 1884).

Opinion

By the Court,

Waldo, C. J.:

The question to be decided in this case is, whether the writ of review will go to bring up the record of the proceedings of a county court, in a civil action, after the right of appeal has gone by by the lapse of more than thirty days since the rendition of the judgment.

Section 875 of the civil code makes sec. 525 applicable to the review of the judgments of county courts in such actions, and sec. 525 expressly enacts that such judgments shall be reviewed on appeal, and not otherwise. The attention of the court, in Christian v. Evans was not called to these sections, and the dictum in that case, that review will lie to a county court after the time for appealing has gone by, must be considered an error.

The judgment must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kirkwood v. Washington County
52 P. 568 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Or. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broback-v-huff-or-1884.