Broan Manufacturing Co. v. Associated Distributors, Inc.
This text of 932 F.2d 1146 (Broan Manufacturing Co. v. Associated Distributors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Upon consideration of Broan’s Motion for Reconsideration of Remand or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss Broan’s Cross-Appeal and Affirm the Verdict Without Remand, the court denies Broan’s motion for reconsideration and grants Broan’s motion to dismiss the cross-appeal.
Although we noted that the District Court did not instruct the jury to reduce future damages to present value, neither party requested such an instruction or objected to its absence. Nor was the issue raised on appeal. Failure to give such an instruction does not amount to plain error in this case. Cf. Kokesh v. American S.S. Co., 747 F.2d 1092, 1095-96 (6th Cir.1984).
Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
932 F.2d 1146, 1991 WL 74168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broan-manufacturing-co-v-associated-distributors-inc-ca6-1991.