Broadwell v. Nixon
This text of 4 N.J.L. 362 (Broadwell v. Nixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
One of the most important duties of the court, is to expound the law to the jury, so as to instruct and guide it. And this duty must in no way be evaded, when the case requires it.
Pullen vs. Boney, ante 128. Mills vs. Sleght, 2 South. 566. Sayres vs. Ward, Pen. *1010. Todd vs. Collins, 1 Hal. 127. Westcott vs. Garrison, 1 Hal. 132. Den, Wintermute vs. Wintermute, 1 Gr. 177. Youngs vs. Sunderland, 3 Gr. 32. Linn vs. Ross, 1 Har. 57. Boylston vs. Valentine, 1 Har. 347. Marshall vs. Hann, 2 Har. 429. Berry vs. Williams, 1 Zab. 428. Cole vs. Taylor, 2 Zab. 60. Folly vs. Vantuyl, 4 Hal. 153. Bellis vs. Phillips, 4 Dutch. 125. Allen vs. Wanamaker, 2 Vr. 370. Davison vs. Schooley, 5 Hal. 145.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 N.J.L. 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broadwell-v-nixon-nj-1817.