Broadway National Bank v. K.H. Ko Pharmacy Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Broadway National Bank v. K.H. Ko Pharmacy Corp.

193 A.D.2d 382, 598 N.Y.S.2d 704

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 4, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 193 A.D.2d 382 (Broadway National Bank v. K.H. Ko Pharmacy Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broadway National Bank v. K.H. Ko Pharmacy Corp., 193 A.D.2d 382, 598 N.Y.S.2d 704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order and judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on March 2, 1992 and March 17, 1992, respectively, inter alia, granting plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and awarding plaintiff $123,787.75, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court properly granted plaintiff summary judgment. Plaintiff established a prima facie case of entitlement to relief upon defendants’ default under the terms of the note and guarantee documents (see, Mount Vernon Trust Co. v Bergoff, 272 NY 192, 196) and defendants’ purported defenses are unavailing. We have considered defendants’ contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Kupferman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order and judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on March 2, 1992 and March 17, 1992, respectively, inter alia, granting plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and awarding plaintiff $123,787.75, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court properly granted plaintiff summary judgment. Plaintiff established a prima facie case of entitlement to relief upon defendants’ default under the terms of the note and guarantee documents (see, Mount Vernon Trust Co. v Bergoff, 272 NY 192, 196) and defendants’ purported defenses are unavailing. We have considered defendants’ contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Kupferman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 382, 598 N.Y.S.2d 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broadway-national-bank-v-kh-ko-pharmacy-corp-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack