Broadway Famous Party Rental v. Cipriani 42nd Street, L. L. C.

289 A.D.2d 45, 734 N.Y.S.2d 433
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 6, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 289 A.D.2d 45 (Broadway Famous Party Rental v. Cipriani 42nd Street, L. L. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Broadway Famous Party Rental v. Cipriani 42nd Street, L. L. C., 289 A.D.2d 45, 734 N.Y.S.2d 433 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered December 13, 2000, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motions to vacate certain default judgments obtained against them by plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Vacatur of the default judgments at issue is precluded by [46]*46defendant’s agreement with plaintiff settling the two actions against it in which the subject default judgments had been obtained by plaintiff. “Stipulations of settlement are favored by the courts and not lightly cast aside” (Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230; see also, Matter of Guttenplan, 222 AD2d 255, 256-257, lv denied 88 NY2d 812), and only “where there is cause sufficient to invalidate a contract, such as fraud, collusion, mistake or accident, will a party be relieved from the consequences of a stipulation made during litigation” (Hallock v State of New York, supra, at 230). Although defendant is intent upon revisiting the propriety of the underlying default judgments, insisting that they were the product of fraud, the settlement agreement was an independent contract between the parties (see, Jablonski v Jablonski, 275 AD2d 692, 693). Defendant, not having demonstrated any basis to excuse it from complying therewith, may not avoid its enforcement by attacking the default judgments or claiming, in a conclusory manner, that it was compelled to settle the actions under the threat of execution (see, Matter of Guttenplan, 222 AD2d 255, 257, lv denied 88 NY2d 812). Concur — Tom, J. P., Andrias, Rubin, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of State of New York v. Public Employment
137 A.D.3d 1467 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 A.D.2d 45, 734 N.Y.S.2d 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broadway-famous-party-rental-v-cipriani-42nd-street-l-l-c-nyappdiv-2001.