Broadway Apartment Co. v. Barnett

118 S.E. 601, 30 Ga. App. 562, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 530
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 10, 1923
Docket13943
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 118 S.E. 601 (Broadway Apartment Co. v. Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Broadway Apartment Co. v. Barnett, 118 S.E. 601, 30 Ga. App. 562, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 530 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinions

Pee Curiam.

1. Notice to an agent of any matter connected with an agency is notice to the principal. Civil Code (1910), § 3599; Friese v. Simpson, 15 Ga. App. 786, 788 (84 S. E. 219).

2. A party who takes the property of another without his consent is guilty of conversion and may be sued in trover for the property, although, being ignorant of the true owner’s title, he may have acted in perfect good faith. M. & M. Trans. Co. v. Moore, 124 Ga. 482 (52 S. E. 802), and citations.

3. Whoever meddles with the property of another, whether principal or agent, does so at his peril, and it makes no difference that in doing so he acts in good faith, nor, in the case of an agent, that he delivers the property to his principal before receiving notice of the claim of the owner. If the agent takes the property of another and delivers it to his principal, it is a conversion, and trover will lie for the recovery of the property or for damages as the plaintiff may elect. Miller v. Wilson, 98 Ga. 569 (25 S. E. 578, 58 Am. St. Rep. 319).

4. Estoppel under the Civil Code (1910), § 4419, operates only in favor of an innocent purchaser without notice.

5. Where a materialman files a claim of lien after the time allowed by law, and never seeks to enforce it, he is not estopped from afterwards suing in trover for his materials, on the ground that he had elected an inconsistent remedy.

6. Under the undisputed facts of the case the court properly directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. None of the special assignments of error are of such merit as would require a reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Luke, J., dissents. Hull & Barrett, for plaintiffs in error. G. Henry & B. S. Gohen, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trust Co. v. Associated Grocers Co-Op, Inc.
263 S.E.2d 676 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Cobb Exchange Bank v. Byrd
134 S.E.2d 871 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Carter v. Hornsby
23 S.E.2d 95 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Williams v. Roberts
1 S.E.2d 587 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Fuller v. Calhoun National Bank
1 S.E.2d 86 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 S.E. 601, 30 Ga. App. 562, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broadway-apartment-co-v-barnett-gactapp-1923.