Broadus v. State

540 So. 2d 789, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 127, 1989 WL 36149
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 31, 1989·No. 87-1456·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our action in quashing the writ of certio-rari in this case should not be taken as an expression of approval regarding the reasoning in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. 540 So.2d 786.

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, ALMON, SHORES, ADAMS, HOUSTON, STEAGALL and KENNEDY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broadus v. State, 540 So. 2d 789, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 127, 1989 WL 36149 (Ala. 1989).

540 So. 2d 789 (Broadus v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
668 So. 2d 102 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1995)
Gentry v. State
689 So. 2d 894 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1994)
DDA v. State
650 So. 2d 571 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1994)