Broadnax v. Washington Mutual Bank FA

147 F. App'x 364
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 20, 2005·No. Nos. 05-1180, 05-1607·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Broadnax appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her civil action arising out of a foreclosure sale. Our review of the record and the opinions of the district court discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Broadnax v. Washington Mutual Bank, Nos. CA-04-693; CA-04-693-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 4, 2005; May 20, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broadnax v. Washington Mutual Bank FA, 147 F. App'x 364 (4th Cir. 2005).

147 F. App'x 364 (Broadnax v. Washington Mutual Bank FA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.