Broadnax v. Washington Mutual Bank FA
This text of 147 F. App'x 364 (Broadnax v. Washington Mutual Bank FA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lisa Broadnax appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her civil action arising out of a foreclosure sale. Our review of the record and the opinions of the district court discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Broadnax v. Washington Mutual Bank, Nos. CA-04-693; CA-04-693-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 4, 2005; May 20, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 F. App'x 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broadnax-v-washington-mutual-bank-fa-ca4-2005.