Broadnax v. Veterans Affairs

Fourth Circuit

Broadnax v. Veterans Affairs

103 F. App'x 760

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 3, 2004

DocketNos. 04-1487, 04-1488

StatusPublished

This text of 103 F. App'x 760 (Broadnax v. Veterans Affairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broadnax v. Veterans Affairs, 103 F. App'x 760 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Lisa Annette Broadnax appeals the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing an appeal from the bankruptcy court for failing to designate the record, as required by Fed. Bankr.R. 8006, and denying her motion for reconsideration and (2) dismissing as untimely another appeal from a bankruptcy court order. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Broadnax v. Veteran Affairs, Nos. CA-04-42-2; CA-03-913-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 9, 2004 & entered Mar. 10, 2004; Apr. 1, 2004; filed Apr. 2, 2004 & entered Apr. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Lisa Annette Broadnax appeals the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing an appeal from the bankruptcy court for failing to designate the record, as required by Fed. Bankr.R. 8006, and denying her motion for reconsideration and (2) dismissing as untimely another appeal from a bankruptcy court order. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Broadnax v. Veteran Affairs, Nos. CA-04-42-2; CA-03-913-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 9, 2004 & entered Mar. 10, 2004; Apr. 1, 2004; filed Apr. 2, 2004 & entered Apr. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 F. App'x 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broadnax-v-veterans-affairs-ca4-2004.