Broadnax v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Broadnax v. State

614 S.W.2d 16, 1981 Mo. App. LEXIS 3704

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 2, 1981·No. No. WD 31387·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Broadnax filed this 27.26 motion following his conviction for second degree murder and sentence to 100 years imprisonment. His conviction was affirmed in State v. Broadnax, 572 S.W.2d 224 (Mo.App.1978).

The trial court denied the 27.26 motion and Broadnax appeals. On this appeal Broadnax contends that women were imper-missibly excluded from his jury under the holding in Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357, 99 S.Ct. 664, 58 L.Ed.2d 579 (1979) and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to file a motion to quash the jury panel.

Broadnax was convicted in March, 1977. The two contentions on this appeal are identical to those raised and decided in Benson v. State, 611 S.W.2d 538, decided December 30, 1980. No purpose would be served by elaborating on the reasons here[17]*17tofore given in Benson for denying the contentions now raised on appeal by Broadnax.

No error of law appears and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b). The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William Broadnax filed this 27.26 motion following his conviction for second degree murder and sentence to 100 years imprisonment. His conviction was affirmed in State v. Broadnax, 572 S.W.2d 224 (Mo.App.1978).

The trial court denied the 27.26 motion and Broadnax appeals. On this appeal Broadnax contends that women were imper-missibly excluded from his jury under the holding in Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357, 99 S.Ct. 664, 58 L.Ed.2d 579 (1979) and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to file a motion to quash the jury panel.

Broadnax was convicted in March, 1977. The two contentions on this appeal are identical to those raised and decided in Benson v. State, 611 S.W.2d 538, decided December 30, 1980. No purpose would be served by elaborating on the reasons here[17]*17tofore given in Benson for denying the contentions now raised on appeal by Broadnax.

No error of law appears and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b). The judgment is affirmed.

Broadnax v. State, 614 S.W.2d 16, 1981 Mo. App. LEXIS 3704 (Mo. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

614 S.W.2d 16 (Broadnax v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related