Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Broadnax v. State

Broadnax v. State

25 S.E. 844, 100 Ga. 62, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 538
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 19, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 25 S.E. 844 (Broadnax v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Broadnax v. State, 25 S.E. 844, 100 Ga. 62, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 538 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

There was no evidence at the trial showing the-age of the accused, or that on account of his tender years he was mentally incapable of committing a crime, and therefore he was presumptively capax do-li; the evidence for the State was -sufficient to warrant the conviction; and the ground of the-motion for a new trial relating to newly discovered -evidence- is. without legal merit. Judgment affb'med.

Lewis & Moore, for plaintiff in error. J. M. Terrell, attorney-general, F. If. Colley, solicitor-general, IF. M. ■Howard, and T. L. Reese, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. State
707 S.E.2d 359 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2011)
Clardy v. State
75 S.E.2d 208 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Clemmons v. State
16 S.E.2d 883 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 S.E. 844, 100 Ga. 62, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broadnax-v-state-ga-1896.