Broadnax v. State
25 S.E. 844, 100 Ga. 62, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 538
Opinion
There was no evidence at the trial showing the-age of the accused, or that on account of his tender years he was mentally incapable of committing a crime, and therefore he was presumptively capax do-li; the evidence for the State was -sufficient to warrant the conviction; and the ground of the-motion for a new trial relating to newly discovered -evidence- is. without legal merit. Judgment affb'med.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Broadnax v. State, 25 S.E. 844, 100 Ga. 62, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 538 (Ga. 1896).
25 S.E. 844 (Broadnax v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adams v. State
707 S.E.2d 359 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2011)
Clardy v. State
75 S.E.2d 208 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Clemmons v. State
16 S.E.2d 883 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)