Broadnax v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Broadnax v. State

106 So. 876, 21 Ala. App. 215, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 26

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 12, 1926

Docket3 Div. 503.

StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 876 (Broadnax v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broadnax v. State, 106 So. 876, 21 Ala. App. 215, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 26 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of murder in the second degree, and given a sentence of 14 years in the penitentiary.

The trial appears to have been had and judgment of conviction entered on March 18, 1925. The bill of exceptions was not pre *216 sented until June 17, 1925, more than 90 days from the date of trial. It follows that the motion of the Attorney General to strike the bill of exceptions must be and is hereby granted. Code 1923, §§ 0433 and 6434. _

There being no prejudicial' error in the record,, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of murder in the second degree, and given a sentence of 14 years in the penitentiary.

The trial appears to have been had and judgment of conviction entered on March 18, 1925. The bill of exceptions was not pre *216 sented until June 17, 1925, more than 90 days from the date of trial. It follows that the motion of the Attorney General to strike the bill of exceptions must be and is hereby granted. Code 1923, §§ 0433 and 6434. _

There being no prejudicial' error in the record,, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 So. 876, 21 Ala. App. 215, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broadnax-v-state-alactapp-1926.