Broadnax v. Homeside Lending, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Broadnax v. Homeside Lending, Inc.

85 F. App'x 334

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 15, 2004·No. No. 03-2104·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lisa Annette Broadnax appeals from the district court’s order dismissing as interlocutory her appeal from a bankruptcy court order entered on March 18, 2008. Our review of the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Broadnax v. Homeside Lending, Inc., Nos. CA-03-319-2; BK-02-72575-DHA (E.D.Va. Aug. 4, 2003). We deny Broadnax’s motions to supplement the record and for judicial review and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lisa Annette Broadnax appeals from the district court’s order dismissing as interlocutory her appeal from a bankruptcy court order entered on March 18, 2008. Our review of the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Broadnax v. Homeside Lending, Inc., Nos. CA-03-319-2; BK-02-72575-DHA (E.D.Va. Aug. 4, 2003). We deny Broadnax’s motions to supplement the record and for judicial review and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Broadnax v. Homeside Lending, Inc., 85 F. App'x 334 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

85 F. App'x 334 (Broadnax v. Homeside Lending, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.