Broadnax v. Harry A. Damino Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Broadnax v. Harry A. Damino Medical Center

29 A.D.2d 519, 285 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2789

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 519 (Broadnax v. Harry A. Damino Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broadnax v. Harry A. Damino Medical Center, 29 A.D.2d 519, 285 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2789 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered August 31, 1967, unanimously modified on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of denying so much thereof as strikes the answer, and the examination of defendant Dunst is directed to continue on December 26, 1967 at Special Term, Part II, New York County, at 10:30 a.m., the examination to be concluded on that day unless otherwise directed by the court; if plaintiff wishes to use a tape recorder she may do so but she will be responsible for any failure and that failure may not be used as an excuse for any continuance. [520]*520Otherwise the order is affirmed. Concur — '.Stevens, J. P., Steuer, Capozzoli, Tilzer, and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered August 31, 1967, unanimously modified on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of denying so much thereof as strikes the answer, and the examination of defendant Dunst is directed to continue on December 26, 1967 at Special Term, Part II, New York County, at 10:30 a.m., the examination to be concluded on that day unless otherwise directed by the court; if plaintiff wishes to use a tape recorder she may do so but she will be responsible for any failure and that failure may not be used as an excuse for any continuance. [520]*520Otherwise the order is affirmed. Concur — '.Stevens, J. P., Steuer, Capozzoli, Tilzer, and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 519, 285 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broadnax-v-harry-a-damino-medical-center-nyappdiv-1967.