Broadmoor Associates v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

183 A.D.2d 548

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.), entered April 22, 1991, which denied the petitioner’s application for a judgment pursuant to CPLR article 78 annulling the respondent’s determination to reclassify the petitioner’s hotel as an apartment building, order rent reductions, and establish new rents, and dismissed the petition, except with respect to the issue of whether the tenant of Apt. 11-A had received furniture services, unani[549]*549mously affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in Matter of Bradford Co. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal (182 AD2d 428) and Matter of Broadway Bretton v New York State Div. of Hous. and Community Renewal (182 AD2d 429). Concur — Rosenberger, J. R, Ellerin, Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broadmoor Associates v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal, 183 A.D.2d 548 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

183 A.D.2d 548 (Broadmoor Associates v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bradford Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
182 A.D.2d 428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Broadway Bretton, Inc. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
182 A.D.2d 429 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)