Broadhurst v. Josephson
340 So. 2d 117, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16032
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 1, 1976·No. Nos. BB-382, BB-383 and BB-384·Published
Opinion
BY
Upon considering the briefs, the record and oral argument, we find no reversible error.
Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed on authority of State v. Hendricks, 309 So.2d 232 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Shaw v. State, 332 So.2d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), is distinguishable and not applicable to the facts in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Broadhurst v. Josephson, 340 So. 2d 117, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16032 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).
340 So. 2d 117 (Broadhurst v. Josephson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hendricks
309 So. 2d 232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Shaw v. State
332 So. 2d 705 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)