Broadhurst v. Josephson

340 So. 2d 117, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16032
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 1, 1976
DocketNos. BB-382, BB-383 and BB-384
StatusPublished

This text of 340 So. 2d 117 (Broadhurst v. Josephson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Broadhurst v. Josephson, 340 So. 2d 117, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16032 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

BY

THE COURT.

Upon considering the briefs, the record and oral argument, we find no reversible error.

Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed on authority of State v. Hendricks, 309 So.2d 232 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Shaw v. State, 332 So.2d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), is distinguishable and not applicable to the facts in this case.

BOYER, C. J., and MILLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hendricks
309 So. 2d 232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Shaw v. State
332 So. 2d 705 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
340 So. 2d 117, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broadhurst-v-josephson-fladistctapp-1976.