Broadhurst v. Carswell
This text of 46 S.E. 658 (Broadhurst v. Carswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in error sued out a possessory warrant against the defendants in error for certain personal property, and the magistrate, on the hearing before him, awarded the possession to the plaintiff; whereupon the defendants took the case to the superior court by certiorari. It appearing from the petition for certiorari and the answer of the magistrate that the plaintiff had, in good faith, acquired the property from one in possession thereof as the apparent owner of it, and that subsequently possession of the property was taken from the plaintiff’s servant, against his will and by intimidation or duress, the court below erred, on the hearing of the certiorari, in awarding the custody of the property to the defendants in error. The question of title was not in issue in this case, and may be settled by another and more appropriate proceeding.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 S.E. 658, 119 Ga. 529, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broadhurst-v-carswell-ga-1904.