Broadfire Corp. v. Turregano

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Broadfire Corp. v. Turregano

438 So. 2d 957, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22389

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 5, 1983

DocketNo. 83-551

StatusPublished

This text of 438 So. 2d 957 (Broadfire Corp. v. Turregano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broadfire Corp. v. Turregano, 438 So. 2d 957, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22389 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After careful review of the record, we conclude that the trial court entered a temporary restraining order on February 25, 1983, which expired by its own terms on March 7, 1983, ten days after its entry. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.610(b). There being no valid court order extending the expiration period beyond the March 7 deadline, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Dehoff v. Imeson, 153 Fla. 553, 15 So.2d 258 (1943); Auffant v. Shoultz, 388 So.2d 41 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

[958]*958The record shows that appellants removed. the vessel, the object of the temporary restraining order, from its designated location on March 29, 1983, twenty-two days after the temporary restraining order’s expiration. Consequently, it cannot be said that appellants violated an existing court order by removing the vessel on March 29, 1983.

Appeal DISMISSED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., SCHEB and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI