Broaddus v. Hohensee
187 A.2d 660, 409 Pa. 535, 1963 Pa. LEXIS 704
This text of 187 A.2d 660 (Broaddus v. Hohensee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Broaddus v. Hohensee, 187 A.2d 660, 409 Pa. 535, 1963 Pa. LEXIS 704 (Pa. 1963).
Opinion
Opinion
Appellee instituted an action of trespass against appellant, alleging fraud and deceit. A jury trial resulted in a verdict for appellee in the amount of $10,-306.12. Appellant’s motion for new trial was denied and judgment was entered on the verdict of the jury; this appeal followed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
187 A.2d 660, 409 Pa. 535, 1963 Pa. LEXIS 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broaddus-v-hohensee-pa-1963.