Broaddus v. Broaddus

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Broaddus v. Broaddus

302 S.W.2d 103

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedFebruary 15, 1957

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 302 S.W.2d 103 (Broaddus v. Broaddus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broaddus v. Broaddus, 302 S.W.2d 103 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion by William B'roaddus, Jr., for an appeal from a judgment of the Estill Circuit Court, which adjudged that he had no interest in a small tract of land valued at $400.

We think the court was warranted in finding that the appellees had acquired title by adverse possession, by virtue of fencing and occupancy. We also think that the findings of fact were sufficient.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Motion by William B'roaddus, Jr., for an appeal from a judgment of the Estill Circuit Court, which adjudged that he had no interest in a small tract of land valued at $400.

We think the court was warranted in finding that the appellees had acquired title by adverse possession, by virtue of fencing and occupancy. We also think that the findings of fact were sufficient.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 S.W.2d 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broaddus-v-broaddus-kyctapp-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack