Broaddus v. Broaddus
302 S.W.2d 103
Opinion
Motion by William B'roaddus, Jr., for an appeal from a judgment of the Estill Circuit Court, which adjudged that he had no interest in a small tract of land valued at $400.
We think the court was warranted in finding that the appellees had acquired title by adverse possession, by virtue of fencing and occupancy. We also think that the findings of fact were sufficient.
The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Broaddus v. Broaddus, 302 S.W.2d 103 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).
302 S.W.2d 103 (Broaddus v. Broaddus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southeastern Fleet Leasing, Inc. v. Gentry
416 S.W.2d 773 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1966)