Broaddrick v. District Court of McIntosh County

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Broaddrick v. District Court of McIntosh County

1967 OK CR 45, 425 P.2d 1009, 1967 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 322

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 29, 1967

DocketNo. A-14099

StatusPublished

This text of 1967 OK CR 45 (Broaddrick v. District Court of McIntosh County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broaddrick v. District Court of McIntosh County, 1967 OK CR 45, 425 P.2d 1009, 1967 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 322 (Okla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge.

The petitioner herein, William Edward Broaddrick, has filed an application for post conviction review of his trial in the District Court of McIntosh County, Case No. 12,250, wherein he was convicted of a felony, and his punishment assessed at six years in the state penitentiary, asserting that he was denied his right to appeal at public expense and his right to be represented by court-appointed counsel. To this petition a Response with affidavits attached was duly filed, and this cause was submitted upon the petition, responses and brief of the respective parties.

From an examination of the pleadings, affidavits and briefs, we are of the opinion that William Edward Broaddrick was not denied any right relating to an appeal within the time originally granted by the trial court, or any valid extension thereof, and that the relief prayed for should be, and the same is hereby, denied.

NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge.

The petitioner herein, William Edward Broaddrick, has filed an application for post conviction review of his trial in the District Court of McIntosh County, Case No. 12,250, wherein he was convicted of a felony, and his punishment assessed at six years in the state penitentiary, asserting that he was denied his right to appeal at public expense and his right to be represented by court-appointed counsel. To this petition a Response with affidavits attached was duly filed, and this cause was submitted upon the petition, responses and brief of the respective parties.

From an examination of the pleadings, affidavits and briefs, we are of the opinion that William Edward Broaddrick was not denied any right relating to an appeal within the time originally granted by the trial court, or any valid extension thereof, and that the relief prayed for should be, and the same is hereby, denied.

NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1967 OK CR 45, 425 P.2d 1009, 1967 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broaddrick-v-district-court-of-mcintosh-county-oklacrimapp-1967.