Broad v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau AG
This text of 10 F. App'x 543 (Broad v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau AG) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Supreme Court of the State of Washington in its case entitled “Certification from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Gary Dean Broad, Denise Broad, husband and wife, appellants v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau, A.G., appellee,” filed September 21, 2000 decided Washington law with regard to service of process under the Hague Convention.
Therefore, we vacate the judgment of the District Court and remand the case to the District Court for a redetermination of the litigation.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 F. App'x 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broad-v-mannesmann-anlagenbau-ag-ca9-2001.