Broad v. Broad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Broad v. Broad

207 Ill. App. 253, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 624

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJuly 19, 1917

DocketGen. No. 23,367

StatusPublished

This text of 207 Ill. App. 253 (Broad v. Broad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broad v. Broad, 207 Ill. App. 253, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 624 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice McDonald

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Receivers, § 2* — when appointment of receiver to protect interest in property is unnecessary. The appointment of a receiver in a suit for a divorce to protect the husband’s interest in property in the wife’s name, and which she owns jointly with a third person, is unnecessary where, upon proper showing, the wife could have been enjoined from disposing or incumbering her interest therein during the pendency of the suit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice McDonald

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Receivers, § 2* — when appointment of receiver to protect interest in property is unnecessary. The appointment of a receiver in a suit for a divorce to protect the husband’s interest in property in the wife’s name, and which she owns jointly with a third person, is unnecessary where, upon proper showing, the wife could have been enjoined from disposing or incumbering her interest therein during the pendency of the suit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 Ill. App. 253, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broad-v-broad-illappct-1917.