Broad River Power Co. v. South Carolina Ex Rel. Daniel
282 U.S. 187, 51 S. Ct. 94, 75 L. Ed. 287, 1930 U.S. LEXIS 15
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 15, 1930·No. 528 (1929 Term)·Published·Cited by 13 cases
Opinions
At the last term the writ of certiorari in this cause was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 281 U. S. 537. A rehearing afterwards was ordered by the Court and the rehearing recently has been had. Upon this further consideration the Court adheres to the .view that the writ of certiorari should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, but the members of the Court differ in the reasons which lead to that decision :
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Broad River Power Co. v. South Carolina Ex Rel. Daniel, 282 U.S. 187, 51 S. Ct. 94, 75 L. Ed. 287, 1930 U.S. LEXIS 15 (1930).
282 U.S. 187 (Broad River Power Co. v. South Carolina Ex Rel. Daniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Condon v. Hodges
562 S.E.2d 623 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2002)
Portland Traction Co. v. Hill
372 P.2d 501 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1962)
Long Motor Lines, Inc. v. SCPSC
103 S.E.2d 762 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1958)
Aclr Co. v. Public Service Comm'n
84 S.E.2d 132 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1954)
Belser v. Commissioner
10 T.C. 1031 (U.S. Tax Court, 1948)
Demorest v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.
321 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1944)
Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Corp. Commission
1 F. Supp. 966 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1932)
Crawford v. Duluth St. Ry. Co.
60 F.2d 212 (Seventh Circuit, 1932)
Abie State Bank v. Bryan
282 U.S. 765 (Supreme Court, 1931)
Broad River Power Co. v. South Carolina Ex Rel. Daniel
282 U.S. 187 (Supreme Court, 1930)