Broach v. Smith

1 Ga. L. Rep. 267
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 267 (Broach v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Broach v. Smith, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 267 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

Blandford, J.

A conveyance made under section 1969 of the Code to secure a debt, and which is void as title on account of usury, cannot be foreclosed as an equitable mortgage.

(a) The declaration to the contrary of this principle in Bullard vs. Long et ux., 68 Ga , 821, was an obiter dictum, tbe point not being made in the record.

(h) The debtor having been adjudged a bankrupt and received his discharge, after giving a security deed which was void on account of usury, the debt was thereby discharged.

(c) The vendor's equitable lien for unpaid purchase money is expressly abolished by the Code of 1863, §1997.

(d) It is not decided that, when it may be necessary for a defendant to resort to equity under similar circumstances with those of the present case, a court of equity may not compel him to do equity by paying the money and lawful interest thereon.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ga. L. Rep. 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broach-v-smith-ga-1885.