Brllarial v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Brllarial v. State

1929 OK CR 465, 282 P. 1116, 45 Okla. Crim. 220, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 528

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 26, 1929

DocketNo. A-7189.

StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 465 (Brllarial v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brllarial v. State, 1929 OK CR 465, 282 P. 1116, 45 Okla. Crim. 220, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 528 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Caddo county on a charge of having possession of a still, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to serve 60 days in the county jail.

The case was tried in September, 1928, and the appeal was lodged in this court in October, 1928. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. The evidence sufficiently sustains the judgment. No material error is made to appear.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Caddo county on a charge of having possession of a still, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to serve 60 days in the county jail.

The case was tried in September, 1928, and the appeal was lodged in this court in October, 1928. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. The evidence sufficiently sustains the judgment. No material error is made to appear.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1929 OK CR 465, 282 P. 1116, 45 Okla. Crim. 220, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brllarial-v-state-oklacrimapp-1929.