Brixham Solutions, Ltd. v. Juniper Networks, Inc.
This text of Brixham Solutions, Ltd. v. Juniper Networks, Inc. (Brixham Solutions, Ltd. v. Juniper Networks, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
BRIXHAM SOLUTIONS, LTD., Appellant
v.
JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., Appellee ______________________
2016-1178 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014- 00431. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
GEORGE C. SUMMERFIELD, JR., Stadheim & Grear, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROLF STADHEIM.
REBECCA CARSON, Irell & Manella LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by NIMA HEFAZI; JONATHAN STUART KAGAN, Los Angeles, CA. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, O’MALLEY, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 6, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brixham Solutions, Ltd. v. Juniper Networks, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brixham-solutions-ltd-v-juniper-networks-inc-cafc-2016.