Brivoy Express Trust v. City of Dayton Ohio

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

BRIVOY EXPRESS TRUST, by and through Wanda D. Otero, Trustee,

Plaintiff, Case No. 3:25-cv-154

vs.

CITY OF DAYTON OHIO, et al., District Judge Michael J. Newman Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Doc. No. 3); (2) DISMISSING THIS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND (3) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE DOCKET ______________________________________________________________________________

This case is before the Court upon pro se Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal of its complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i).1 Doc. No. 3. For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. See Aamot v. Kassel, 1 F.3d 441, 445 (6th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and TERMINATED on the docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. June 5, 2025 s/Michael J. Newman Hon. Michael J. Newman United States District Judge

1 As with all pro se litigants, Plaintiff’s documents and allegations are liberally construed in Plaintiff’s favor. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam).